El 23/6/24 a las 14:33, Arthur de Jong escribió:
On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 13:36 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Arthur: Would be ok for you if I fix this in bullseye via team
upload?
Please do, thanks.
I only have limited time available at the moment and have quite a big
backlog of issues to pick
On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 13:36 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Arthur: Would be ok for you if I fix this in bullseye via team
> upload?
Please do, thanks.
I only have limited time available at the moment and have quite a big
backlog of issues to pick up so any help is really welcome.
Thanks,
--
--
I wrote:
But what would be the proper fix in bullseye?
Nevermind. Arthur already answered to that here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022311#15
Arthur: Would be ok for you if I fix this in bullseye via team upload?
Thanks.
El 23/5/24 a las 12:39, Petter Reinholdtsen escribió:
Is there still any reason to keep this RC BTS report open?
It's not actually RC for trixie because version tracking says trixie is not
affected.
However, I'm closing the bug so that people who insist on following version
tracking
Is there still any reason to keep this RC BTS report open?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1022311
Bug #1022311 {Done: Arthur de Jong } [src:python-stdnum]
python-stdnum: FTBFS: AssertionError: Failed doctest test for
test_no_fodselsnummer.doctest
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all
reopen 1022311
found 1022311 1.16-1
found 1022311 1.17-1
fixed 1022311 1.18-1
thanks
El 13/11/22 a las 22:45, Arthur de Jong escribió:
If this ever needs to be backported for some reason the fix is trivial:
On Sun, 2022-10-23 at 14:50 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
A fix has just been uploaded and is part of version 1.18-1.
If this ever needs to be backported for some reason the fix is trivial:
Source: python-stdnum
Version: 1.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
9 matches
Mail list logo
