Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #1024493 [src:bs1770gain] Proposed-RM: bs1770gain -- RoQA; inappropriate
content
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
--
1024493: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024493
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 wishlist
It is clear that there is no concensus on this issue. It is not a
technical problem with the code, but a question of opinions. Because of
this, I set severity to wishlist.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:53:43 +0100 Leon van Kammen
wrote:
> my few cents: the problem with censorship is, once you start, the
> rabbithole is infinite.
> Whatever shitty homepage or comment it is, eventually it's just a homepage
> or comment.
> I think debian-devs should not be going down the
my few cents: the problem with censorship is, once you start, the
rabbithole is infinite.
Whatever shitty homepage or comment it is, eventually it's just a homepage
or comment.
I think debian-devs should not be going down the rabbithole of scanning all
code for 'bad' words, bad images, suspicious
Personally I find the story of Daryl Davis inspiring, and believe such
approach have higher chances of success than one using contempt and
rejection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daryl_Davis >
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 10:12:32PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>[Christoph Berg]
>
>> It's not just "views" of the author. The crap is deeply embedded into
>> the source code. This thing needs to go.
>
>Where and what is this 'crap' that is 'deeply embedded into the source
>code'? Are we
[Christoph Berg]
> By playing innocent and claiming that this would be "cancel culture",
> you are effectively promoting these views.
No, I am not. Exceptional claims require exceptional proofs.
> It's not just "views" of the author. The crap is deeply embedded into
> the source code. This
Re: Petter Reinholdtsen
> I do not buy into the cancel culture. I further do not find the guilt by
> association argument (his web page is full of bad stuff, so his software
> is bad) convincing. In short, I fail to see it as an argument for
> removing bs1770gain from Debian.
By playing
I do not buy into the cancel culture. I further do not find the guilt by
association argument (his web page is full of bad stuff, so his software
is bad) convincing. In short, I fail to see it as an argument for
removing bs1770gain from Debian.
I removed the controversial text from the running
Re: Ansgar
> I proposed to remove bs1770gain from Debian. Besides the problem from
> #913352, the upstream homepage and domain that we direct users to (via
> Homepage: field and other places) contain extremist content.
>
> I don't think it's worth distributing software that does this in
> Debian.
Source: bs1770gain
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
I proposed to remove bs1770gain from Debian. Besides the problem from
#913352, the upstream homepage and domain that we direct users to (via
Homepage: field and other places) contain extremist content.
I don't think it's worth
11 matches
Mail list logo
