Bug#1031660: Upload of fava

2023-02-21 Thread Blair Noctis
On 2023/2/21 21:38, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > I think that this should be changed once bookworm is released. However, as > Blair > pointed out, there are several node-* packages needed for this, which are > currently not packaged for Debian. Not exactly, all d3 subpackages are present, we do

Bug#1031660: Upload of fava

2023-02-21 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 21.02.23 um 14:38 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer: However, although all sources are included in Debian, we do not use them currently to actually build fava from source, we're just using their pre-generated static files. ... which is a Policy violation.

Bug#1031660: Upload of fava

2023-02-21 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Am 21.02.23 um 13:19 schrieb Bastian Germann: I think, the reason is for the .egg-info not being included anymore. Tobias, you changed the watch file for subsequent uploads to come from GitHub instead of PyPI. This came into effect only with Blair's upload. I guess when we change the orig

Bug#1031660: Upload of fava

2023-02-21 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 21.02.23 um 13:19 schrieb Bastian Germann: I guess when we change the orig tarball to come from PyPI it will be fine. I can try it these days Works. The problem is that the frontend content is not built from source then (not a regression from the older version). The thing uses node, so

Bug#1031660: Upload of fava

2023-02-21 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 21.02.23 um 12:30 schrieb Blair Noctis: On 2023/2/21 18:52, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: Hi Travis, thanks for your bugreport, I can confirm that fava does no longer work. I'm getting the same error as you. @Blair and @Bastian: The contents of the binary package are missing quite a lot of

Bug#1031660: Upload of fava

2023-02-21 Thread Blair Noctis
On 2023/2/21 18:52, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > Hi Travis, > > thanks for your bugreport, I can confirm that fava does no longer work. I'm > getting the same error as you. > > @Blair and @Bastian: The contents of the binary package are missing quite a > lot > of important files, so I think

Bug#1031660: Upload of fava

2023-02-21 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Hi Travis, thanks for your bugreport, I can confirm that fava does no longer work. I'm getting the same error as you. @Blair and @Bastian: The contents of the binary package are missing quite a lot of important files, so I think the latest upload (version 1.23.1) should be reverted. My