I've just pushed an update to the code here...
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>On 10/04/2023 at 15:13, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Overall comment: I'm not trying to make the heuristics 100% reliable
>> here, as I don't think that's actually possible. Instead,
On 10/04/2023 at 15:13, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Overall comment: I'm not trying to make the heuristics 100% reliable
here, as I don't think that's actually possible. Instead, I'm trying
to tread the fine line of:
* minimising false negatives - let's try to pick up on the most
common cases
Hey Pascal, and thanks for the review!
Overall comment: I'm not trying to make the heuristics 100% reliable
here, as I don't think that's actually possible. Instead, I'm trying
to tread the fine line of:
* minimising false negatives - let's try to pick up on the most
common cases where
partman-efi "Fix detection of BIOS-bootable systems" provides a
significant improvement over previous behaviour. However I have a few
comments.
1a) The patch assumes that a GPT disk may be BIOS-bootable only if it
has a BIOS boot partition. But a GPT disk can be BIOS-bootable even
without a
Hello,
On 03/04/2023 at 21:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
- It very much looks like the intermediary states are slightly
different when setting up LVM and when setting up encrypted LVM, and
the LVM case case leads to some confusion in partman-efi's
/lib/partman/init.d/50efi (which
Package: partman-auto-lvm
Version: 87
Severity: serious
Justification: Maintainer says so
TL;DR: Answering “Yes” to the “Force UEFI installation?” makes sure the
installer pulls the right bootloader packages, despite misreading the
situation.
I've discovered this while testing D-I Bookworm RC 1
6 matches
Mail list logo
