Bug#1061216: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-05-07 Thread Gregor Riepl
If a fix for this can't be released on time, I'm requesting an exception for llvm-15. Removing OpenVDB from Debian will affect Blender, which is is relatively high-profile and should not just be axed for the sake if a pruning operation. You still have time, we aren't going to release the trix

Bug#1061216: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-05-06 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 06/05/2024 à 10:27, Gregor Riepl a écrit : Which LLVM versions are you planning to remove? 15, 16 soon. 17 later. Would it be possible to keep at least LLVM 15 until upstream has upgraded their code base? Sounds very unlikely for the next Debian release. If a fix for this can't be rel

Bug#1061216: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-05-06 Thread Gregor Riepl
Which LLVM versions are you planning to remove? 15, 16 soon. 17 later. Would it be possible to keep at least LLVM 15 until upstream has upgraded their code base? Sounds very unlikely for the next Debian release. If a fix for this can't be released on time, I'm requesting an exception for l

Bug#1061216: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-05-05 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 05/05/2024 à 02:30, Gregor Riepl a écrit : As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -17. This package depends on 14. Not possible at this time. Trying to build openvdb 10.0.1 against LLVM 17 results in the follow

Bug#1061216: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-17

2024-05-04 Thread Gregor Riepl
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -17. This package depends on 14. Not possible at this time. Trying to build openvdb 10.0.1 against LLVM 17 results in the following error: CMake Error at openvdb_ax/openvdb_ax