Control: retitle -1 geany: consider bumping ABI
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> So I'm not totally sure but to me it seems like renaming geany to geany-t64
> is the way.
For library packages, the rename was useful. For things like an
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 geany: consider bumping ABI
Bug #1061346 [geany] geany: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in
shlibs
Changed Bug title to 'geany: consider bumping ABI' from 'geany: identified for
time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs'.
> severity -1 important
Hi,
Geany developer here.
I'm not involved in the time_t transition, just noticed the many package
updates as a Debian Testing user :).
So I'm not totally sure but to me it seems like renaming geany to
geany-t64 is the way.
As far as I know, the geany package is required only by the
geany-
Package: geany
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainers,
Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies
geany as an affected package, on the basis that the headers could not
be compiled and analyzed out of the
4 matches
Mail list logo
