On Thu 2024-05-30 18:34:13 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> the issue report refers to two patches, one of these is already part of
> 2.2.43. The other one[1] seemed pretty straightforward to backport
> (functions moved to other files and cipher_filter_ocb instead of
> cipher_filter_aead). I would
On 2024-05-27 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
[...]
> Would anyone be willing to try to backport the patches from upstream's
> fixes for T6481 to the 2.2.x series?
Hello Daniel,
the issue report refers to two patches, one of these is already part of
2.2.43. The other one[1] seemed pretty
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1071552 [gnupg] GnuPG 2.2.42+ breaks emacs' EasyPG
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1071552: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: gnupg
Version: 2.2.43-6
Severity: critical
Dear Maintainer,
Current GnuPG package, version 2.2.43, brek Emacs's EasyPG.
We are no longer able to store encrypted files completely.
Well-kown issue: https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/etc/PROBLEMS
--- quote ---
*** Saving a
4 matches
Mail list logo
