Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:39:50PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>>Hi Dan,
>>
>>On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:48:58AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:26:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>>>
There has been absolutely no progress. It'
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:07:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I assume you're referring to observer.h etc.?
>
> This actually indicates a nasty licensing mistake upstream.
I don't have any reason to believe that there is a problem here.
observer.texi does not have an explicit license, GFDL
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:39:50PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:48:58AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:26:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > There has been absolutely no progress. It's March. The manual still
> > >
Hi Dan,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:48:58AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:26:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > There has been absolutely no progress. It's March. The manual still
> > contains
> > invariant sections upstream and in Debian. Documentation with
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:26:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> There has been absolutely no progress. It's March. The manual still
> contains
> invariant sections upstream and in Debian. Documentation with invariant
> sections was reaffirmed as non-free in the most recent GR.
>
> Time t
There has been absolutely no progress. It's March. The manual still contains
invariant sections upstream and in Debian. Documentation with invariant
sections was reaffirmed as non-free in the most recent GR.
Time to remove the manual.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"It's just a g
6 matches
Mail list logo
