Hi,
ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
pgpinjYAmKolD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts it?
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts it?
Nobody stood up to
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
* Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts it?
#289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time
Re: Matej Vela in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts it?
As one of the caff/signing-party people, I can say that caff serves
the same purpose as cabot, is a lot
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
* Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts
6 matches
Mail list logo