# let's have this on both
reassign 279232 perl,doc-base
thanks
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:25:06PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
it could be fixed by introducing a versioned pre-dependency of
perl-modules on perl-base while letting
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:12:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Given the recent freeze announcement, I'd suggest that regardless of
what other fixes are made, a good first step would be to get a fixed
doc-base (i.e. one that works with the current stable perl-base only)
package into
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
it could be fixed by introducing a versioned pre-dependency of
perl-modules on perl-base while letting perl-base conflict with too old
perl-modules, which forces apt to update both packages together; this
combination may be highly
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:25:06PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
it could be fixed by introducing a versioned pre-dependency of
perl-modules on perl-base while letting perl-base conflict with too old
perl-modules, which forces apt to update both packages together; this
combination may be highly
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:09:31PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
Moin,
bug #279232 is assigned to doc-base, though it is (as to my analysis) a perl
problem (see the thread in the BTS). This prevents clean dist-upgrades from
woody to sarge.
what do you think about the solution (using pre-depends
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:03:23PM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:09:31PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
Moin,
bug #279232 is assigned to doc-base, though it is (as to my analysis) a perl
problem (see the thread in the BTS). This prevents clean dist-upgrades from
6 matches
Mail list logo
