Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 31 Aug 2007 09:16:02 -0300, a écrit :
>> Can you try to make it to fail properly?
>
> I'm in the train so I couldn't download version 1.8 of parted with its
> test engine, but the attached program fails without the patch
Hi,
Otavio Salvador, le Fri 31 Aug 2007 09:16:02 -0300, a écrit :
> Can you try to make it to fail properly?
I'm in the train so I couldn't download version 1.8 of parted with its
test engine, but the attached program fails without the patch.
Samuel
// cc -std=c99 test.c -lparted -o test
//#inc
Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Otavio Salvador, le Thu 30 Aug 2007 16:55:08 -0300, a écrit :
>> I've produced [...] a test that was suppose to fail without the
>> libparted/disk.c change (included on the patch and that you need to
>> revert for testing) but I cannot make it
Hi,
Otavio Salvador, le Thu 30 Aug 2007 16:55:08 -0300, a écrit :
> I've produced [...] a test that was suppose to fail without the
> libparted/disk.c change (included on the patch and that you need to
> revert for testing) but I cannot make it to fail.
Because it only tests primary partitions.
Hello,
I've produced a patch for commit and a test that was suppose to fail
without the libparted/disk.c change (included on the patch and that
you need to revert for testing) but I cannot make it to fail.
I've tryed to use extended partitions and they also are cloned
properly so I think the prob
5 matches
Mail list logo
