Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-29 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Samstag 26 März 2005 09:15 schrieb Ben Burton: Coolo, do you have any specific requests or instructions for KDE_3_4_BRANCH? If possible don't try experimental cervisia ;-)) Greetings, Stephan

Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-28 Thread Christian Loose
Am Samstag, 26. März 2005 09:25 schrieb André Wöbbeking: On Saturday 26 March 2005 09:15, Ben Burton wrote: Hi again, At this stage it seems that everyone is happy to go with a dual QPL/GPL license for cervisia. My question now is how to go forward with the change. I prefer a single

Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-28 Thread André Wöbbeking
On Monday 28 March 2005 15:31, Christian Loose wrote: I changed the license locally here from QPL to GPL v2 or later. Please speak up now, if you don't agree with this license change. Otherwise I will commit the changes to HEAD on Wednesday evening (CEST). OK. What about backporting for KDE

Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-28 Thread Ben Burton
What about backporting for KDE 3.4, the current KDE version? If it's possible to do this for KDE_3_3_BRANCH also then I'd be most appreciative, since KDE 3.3 is currently the most likely candidate for the coming debian release. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-26 Thread André Wöbbeking
On Saturday 26 March 2005 09:15, Ben Burton wrote: Hi again, At this stage it seems that everyone is happy to go with a dual QPL/GPL license for cervisia. My question now is how to go forward with the change. I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this shouldn't be

Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-26 Thread Andras Mantia
On Saturday 26 March 2005 10:15, Ben Burton wrote: I'm not sure if Bernd Gehrmann still uses his CVS account. Andras, would it be in any way possible to find out if Bernd wishes to make these changes himself, and if not to obtain some form of authorisation? I'm not sure how formal the KDE

Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-26 Thread Ben Burton
Hi again, At this stage it seems that everyone is happy to go with a dual QPL/GPL license for cervisia. My question now is how to go forward with the change. Thiago has written with the following instructions: If you people are ok with a dual license, then please place notices in all your

Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-26 Thread Ben Burton
I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this shouldn't be a problem, right? I don't see why not; from Bernd's reply (courtsey of Andras), he seems happy with this also. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-26 Thread Andras Mantia
On Saturday 26 March 2005 10:36, Ben Burton wrote: I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this shouldn't be a problem, right? I don't see why not; from Bernd's reply (courtsey of Andras), he seems happy with this also. Yes, he wrote that if the licensing of the

Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?

2005-03-26 Thread Richard Moore
Do I need to add a copyright since I did the kparts port? Rich. On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:02:25 +0200, Andras Mantia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 26 March 2005 10:36, Ben Burton wrote: I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this shouldn't be a problem,