Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:29:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297583: openafs-modules-source: Build fails with
../linux/sched.h:156: parse error when compiling for SMP kernel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2005 16:20:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 01 08:20:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dns.pace2020.com (wahoo.pace2020.com) [65.196.130.133]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6A72-0003AE-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 08:20:44 -0800
Received: from 14-4.builds.pace2020.com ([192.168.1.3] helo=lionfish.oceania)
by wahoo.pace2020.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1D6A71-0006wd-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:20:43 -0500
Received: from proyal by lionfish.oceania with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1D6A9G-0002Mv-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:23:02 -0500
From: peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openafs-modules-source: Build fails with ../linux/sched.h:156: parse
error when compiling for SMP kernel
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:23:02 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openafs-modules-source
Version: 1.2.3final2-6
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
I received the following error when compiling for 2.4.24 SMP:
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strength-reduce -pipe -march=i486
-malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -D__KERNEL__ -DCPU=586
-DKERNEL -D_KERNEL -DMODULE -DAFS_SMP -I. -I../
-I/usr/src/modules/openafs/src/config -c ../afs/afs_analyze.c;
In file included from ../asm/uaccess.h:8,
from ../afs/../afs/sysincludes.h:65,
from ../afs/afs_analyze.c:19:
../linux/sched.h:156: parse error
../linux/sched.h:159: warning: `set_cpus_allowed' redefined
../linux/modules/ksyms.ver:652: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
In file included from ../afs/../afs/../rx/../rx/rx_packet.h:45,
from ../afs/../afs/../rx/rx.h:38,
from ../afs/../afs/afsincludes.h:30,
from ../afs/afs_analyze.c:35:
/usr/include/sys/sysmacros.h:28: warning: `major' redefined
../linux/kdev_t.h:80: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
/usr/include/sys/sysmacros.h:29: warning: `minor' redefined
../linux/kdev_t.h:81: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
make[6]: *** [afs_analyze.o] Error 1
make[6]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/modules/openafs/src/libafs/MODLOAD-2.4.24-MP'
make[5]: *** [linux_compdirs] Error 2
make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/openafs/src/libafs'
make[4]: *** [libafs] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/openafs'
make[3]: *** [build] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/openafs'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/openafs'
make[1]: *** [build-modules-stamp] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/openafs'
Module /usr/src/modules/openafs failed.
Hit return to Continue
The patch mentioned at
<https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2002-July/008194.html>
got me past the issue.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lionfish 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages openafs-modules-source depends on:
ii bison 1:1.875a-1 A parser generator that is compati
ii debhelper 4.2.10 helper programs for debian/rules
ii flex 2.5.4a-24 A fast lexical analyzer generator.
ii libncurses5-dev 5.3.20030719-5 Developer's libraries and docs for
ii libpam0g-dev 0.72-35 Development files for PAM
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297583-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2005 22:29:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 10 15:29:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu [171.67.16.138]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dgs05-00016p-00; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:29:17 -0700
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
by smtp3.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j5AMTGsf026434
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:29:16 -0700
Received: (qmail 30267 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Jun 2005 22:29:16 -0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#297583: openafs-modules-source: Build fails with
../linux/sched.h:156: parse error when compiling for SMP kernel
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:29:16 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This bug has been fixed in the current Debian stable release (3.1, aka
sarge). I'm afraid that no fix is planned for woody; we recommend
upgrading from woody to sarge.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
