Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-28 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:12:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 297806 thanks Ola, Thanks. On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 11:26:44PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Your fix is now applied. Thanks a lot. 0.30.204-2 still doesn't fix the problem where gcc (and therefore diet) is

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:12:35AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 11:26:44PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Your fix is now applied. Thanks a lot. 0.30.204-2 still doesn't fix the problem where gcc (and therefore diet) is being invoked as a cross-compiler, so we still

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-28 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:12:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: 0.30.204-2 still doesn't fix the problem where gcc (and therefore diet) is being invoked as a cross-compiler, so we still have build failures on powerpc, hppa, and mipsel due to the mismatch of directory names. See

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-27 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello Your fix is now applied. Thanks a lot. Regards, // Ola On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds still fail on at least hppa,

Processed: Re: Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 297806 Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-27 Thread Steve Langasek
reopen 297806 thanks Ola, On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 11:26:44PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Your fix is now applied. Thanks a lot. 0.30.204-2 still doesn't fix the problem where gcc (and therefore diet) is being invoked as a cross-compiler, so we still have build failures on powerpc, hppa, and

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds still fail on at least hppa, powerpc, and mipsel, since the dietlibc linking fails. See

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:55:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:45:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-25 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:45:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds still fail on at least

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-25 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:55:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: The workaround for sparc wouldn't be necessary if the diet wrapper is called with the -Os option (this adds -mcpu=supersparc), a good idea anyway for all

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-25 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 05:44:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:23:01PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: It most certainly is *not* a good idea; it's contraindicated by policy to build binaries with -Os

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-06 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.203-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=util-vserver for the full build log I actually think this is a bug in gcc or

Bug#297806: [Vserver] Re: Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-06 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:20:06AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:56:43PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hello On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.203-1 Severity: serious Tags:

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-05 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.203-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=util-vserver for the full build log Thanks a lot. This is interesting to

Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental

2005-03-02 Thread Andreas Barth
Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.203-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=util-vserver for the full build log Cheers, Andi Automatic build of util-vserver_0.30.203-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 1.170.5 Build started at