Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 306015 important quit On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded > it, it would be nice if you would: > - Cc me > - send a better explanation than "This is not a missing dependency, feh" If you a

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You seem to confuse this with bug closing. It's common practice to > adjust the severity of a bug to a RC one if a RC issue was mistakenly > reported as non-RC, and neither your Developers Reference nor your > release team have ever disagreed with this

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > severity 306015 grave > > thanks > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded > > it, it would be nice if you would: > > - Cc me

Bug#306015: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > severity 306015 grave > thanks > > Hi Steve, > > first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded > it, it would be nice if you would: > - Cc me > - send a better explanation than "This is not a missing dependency, feh" Looking at t