Bug#325335: Greylisting config doc is incorrect

2005-10-15 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
tag #325335 - patch severity #325335 important thanks On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 04:49:33PM +0200, Clément Stenac wrote: As you have spamassassin 3.X, you need to follow the 3.X instructions, that are around line 190 of README.greylisting.gz, and which tell to use eval:greylisting and a priority

Processed: Re: Bug#325335: Greylisting config doc is incorrect

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag #325335 - patch Bug#325335: Greylisting Config. Doc. ist incorrect Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch severity #325335 important Bug#325335: Greylisting Config. Doc. ist incorrect Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here

Bug#325335: Greylisting config doc is incorrect

2005-09-04 Thread Clément Stenac
tag #325335 +patch thanks Hello, As you have spamassassin 3.X, you need to follow the 3.X instructions, that are around line 190 of README.greylisting.gz, and which tell to use eval:greylisting and a priority instead of the reseval hack. However, the file is indeed badly worded, and unclear.

Bug#325335: Greylisting Config. Doc. ist incorrect

2005-08-27 Thread Joachim Zobel
Package: sa-exim Version: 4.2-2 Severity: serious Hi. I have just configured greylisting (with exim4-daemon-heavy 4.50-8) for my Sarge box. /usr/share/doc/sa-exim/README.greylisting.gz said I should put header GREYLIST_ISWHITE reseval:greylisting(( 'dir' = '/var/spool/sa-exim/tuplets';