Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Severity change pending a mutual agreement of the problem.
reopen 326644
Bug#326644: gpm: modifies conffile?
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
# Severity change pending a mutual agreement of the problem.
reopen 326644
thanks
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 06:32:12AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 02:13:24PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Package: gpm
Severity: serious
Version: 1.19.6-21
File: /etc/gpm.conf
[Justin Pryzby]
Based on my understanding of the situation, an old version of GPM had
a conffile, which is now a UCF-handled configuration file, no? If
this is correct, I propose that GPM should parse any existing
conffile, and determine all the values it sets, and store those
values via
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:15:36AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Justin Pryzby]
Based on my understanding of the situation, an old version of GPM had
a conffile, which is now a UCF-handled configuration file, no? If
this is correct, I propose that GPM should parse any existing
[Justin Pryzby]
Then why does it prompt me? Does prerm remove the conffile after
parsing it?
That's a really good question. ucf is supposed to take care of this
type of stuff - knowing when a config file was changed by the admin and
when it was only changed by the package. ucf support
package gpm
tag 326644 wontfix sarge
retitle 326644 gpm: ucf considers non-ucf config file manually modified
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:56:23AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
# Severity change pending a mutual agreement of the problem.
reopen 326644
thanks
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package gpm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gpm
tag 326644 wontfix sarge
Bug#326644: gpm: modifies conffile?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix, sarge
retitle 326644 gpm: ucf considers non-ucf config file manually modified
Bug#326644: gpm
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:48:58AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:56:23AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 06:32:12AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 02:13:24PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Package: gpm
Severity: serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package gpm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gpm
severity 326644 normal
Bug#326644: gpm: ucf considers non-ucf config file manually modified
Severity set to `normal'.
thankee
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
package gpm
severity 326644 normal
thankee
[Guillem Jover]
Marking this bug wontfix, but I don't really see the point in keeping
this open, and I think that RC is an exaggeration on the magnitude of
the problem. Peter?
Right. As far as I know we correctly preserve local admin settings.
Package: gpm
Severity: serious
Version: 1.19.6-21
File: /etc/gpm.conf
Justification: maintscripts apparently modify conffile (violates: 10.7.3)
While doing a dist upgrade:
Preparing to replace gpm 1.19.6-20 (using .../gpm_1.19.6-21_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gpm ...
I got a message
11 matches
Mail list logo
