Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-06-15 Thread Paul Slootman
> I also don't have much time currently, therefore I can't promise you a > working patch right now. I have a version that I think works OK, I'll upload now. (2.9-1). If there are problems with it, feel free to NMU, using that version as a basis. I'm away on vacation for a week or so from tomorro

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-06-15 Thread Frank Küster
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So does it make sense that I start of with the old ones? I guess I need > > Yes... So you mean the structure won't change much, and if I provide a patch against that it will still kind of apply to your new ones? >> config, postinst and maybe the templ

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-06-14 Thread Paul Slootman
Real life delays, sorry... On Thu 06 Apr 2006, Frank K?ster wrote: > So does it make sense that I start of with the old ones? I guess I need Yes... > config, postinst and maybe the templates file. > > Here's a quick shot, untested: > > In wwwoffle.config: > > if [ -s /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle ];

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-06-06 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 02 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello Paul, what is the status with this package ? > As a result of this problem, wwwoffle has been removed from testing. Unfortunately real life got into the way. I hope to upload a fixed version within 10 days. Paul Slootman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-06-02 Thread allomber
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:21:45PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > My problem is with the wording of your bug report, you demand the file > mustn't be recreated. If you now qualify that by saying that if the user > does indeed enter a frequency again then it's OK to recreate the file, > then I indeed

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-04-06 Thread Frank Küster
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I'm talking about the case where you just entered a value, >> > interactively. >> >> But I may have changed my mind, and i shouldn't be forced to use debconf >> then. No, I *mustn't* be forced. > > I'm talking about someone who wants to use debconf..

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-04-05 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:21:45PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > My problem is with the wording of your bug report, you demand the file > mustn't be recreated. If you now qualify that by saying that if the user > does indeed enter a frequency again then it's OK to recreate the file, > then I indeed

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-04-05 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > >> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle > >> > should regularly fetch its lis

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-04-05 Thread Frank Küster
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote: >> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle >> > should regularly fetch its list, then why remove the cron.d entry... >> >> Because

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-04-05 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle > > should regularly fetch its list, then why remove the cron.d entry... > > Because debconf is not a registry. It's a frontend for ma

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-04-05 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 03:50:48PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Wed 07 Sep 2005, Frank K?ster wrote: > > and indeed the postinst scripts recreates the file if it has been > > deleted. However, the policy says clearly: > > > > , > > | 10.7.3 Behavior > > | > > | Configuration file handlin

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-04-05 Thread Frank Küster
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed 07 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote: >> >> /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle contains: >> >> # If you want to disable this, comment out the line >> # below (don't simply remove this file). > > Note also that your subject is incorrect, it is *not* marked a conffil

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-04-05 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 07 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote: > > /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle contains: > > # If you want to disable this, comment out the line > # below (don't simply remove this file). Note also that your subject is incorrect, it is *not* marked a conffile. It's not even shipped with the package. > and i

Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2005-09-07 Thread Frank Küster
Package: wwwoffle Version: 2.8e-2 Severity: serious Justification: Violates "must" clause of the policy /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle contains: # If you want to disable this, comment out the line # below (don't simply remove this file). and indeed the postinst scripts recreates the file if it has been de