> I also don't have much time currently, therefore I can't promise you a
> working patch right now.
I have a version that I think works OK, I'll upload now. (2.9-1).
If there are problems with it, feel free to NMU, using that version
as a basis. I'm away on vacation for a week or so from tomorro
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So does it make sense that I start of with the old ones? I guess I need
>
> Yes...
So you mean the structure won't change much, and if I provide a patch
against that it will still kind of apply to your new ones?
>> config, postinst and maybe the templ
Real life delays, sorry...
On Thu 06 Apr 2006, Frank K?ster wrote:
> So does it make sense that I start of with the old ones? I guess I need
Yes...
> config, postinst and maybe the templates file.
>
> Here's a quick shot, untested:
>
> In wwwoffle.config:
>
> if [ -s /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle ];
On Fri 02 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Paul, what is the status with this package ?
> As a result of this problem, wwwoffle has been removed from testing.
Unfortunately real life got into the way.
I hope to upload a fixed version within 10 days.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:21:45PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> My problem is with the wording of your bug report, you demand the file
> mustn't be recreated. If you now qualify that by saying that if the user
> does indeed enter a frequency again then it's OK to recreate the file,
> then I indeed
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'm talking about the case where you just entered a value,
>> > interactively.
>>
>> But I may have changed my mind, and i shouldn't be forced to use debconf
>> then. No, I *mustn't* be forced.
>
> I'm talking about someone who wants to use debconf..
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:21:45PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> My problem is with the wording of your bug report, you demand the file
> mustn't be recreated. If you now qualify that by saying that if the user
> does indeed enter a frequency again then it's OK to recreate the file,
> then I indeed
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle
> >> > should regularly fetch its lis
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle
>> > should regularly fetch its list, then why remove the cron.d entry...
>>
>> Because
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle
> > should regularly fetch its list, then why remove the cron.d entry...
>
> Because debconf is not a registry. It's a frontend for ma
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 03:50:48PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 07 Sep 2005, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > and indeed the postinst scripts recreates the file if it has been
> > deleted. However, the policy says clearly:
> >
> > ,
> > | 10.7.3 Behavior
> > |
> > | Configuration file handlin
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed 07 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>> /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle contains:
>>
>> # If you want to disable this, comment out the line
>> # below (don't simply remove this file).
>
> Note also that your subject is incorrect, it is *not* marked a conffil
On Wed 07 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle contains:
>
> # If you want to disable this, comment out the line
> # below (don't simply remove this file).
Note also that your subject is incorrect, it is *not* marked a conffile.
It's not even shipped with the package.
> and i
Package: wwwoffle
Version: 2.8e-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Violates "must" clause of the policy
/etc/cron.d/wwwoffle contains:
# If you want to disable this, comment out the line
# below (don't simply remove this file).
and indeed the postinst scripts recreates the file if it has been
de
14 matches
Mail list logo