On Monday 26 September 2005 17:11, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> My raid install of sarge used grub. Why ever would you want it to use
> lilo?
No idea. Just noticed in installation reports that quite a few users
prefer lilo over grub.
> Or does grub behave that differently on amd64 that it can't su
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 12:22:23PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Because LILO is the default installer in some cases (/ on XFS IIRC) and is
> also ofter prefered by users for RAID installs.
> Also, it is a clear regression from Sarge.
My raid install of sarge used grub. Why ever would you want it to
On Sunday 25 September 2005 09:40, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Why the serious severity? lilo is not the default boot loader, so
> this only affect expert installs.
Because LILO is the default installer in some cases (/ on XFS IIRC) and is
also ofter prefered by users for RAID installs.
Also, i
[Frans Pop]
> Severity: serious
Why the serious severity? lilo is not the default boot loader, so
this only affect expert installs.
> In commit r29833 the value of link_in_boot was changed from false to
> true for i386 and amd64. This change make lilo-installer fail as
> lilo.conf is configured
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.24
Severity: serious
In commit r29833 the value of link_in_boot was changed from false to true
for i386 and amd64. This change make lilo-installer fail as lilo.conf is
configured to expect symlinks for the kernel and initrd in / (if boot is
not a separate part
5 matches
Mail list logo
