Processed: Re: Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 335105 kernel Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork Bug reassigned from package `perl' to `kernel'. > close 335105 2.6.5 Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Develo

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2006-06-02 Thread Brendan O'Dea
reassign 335105 kernel close 335105 2.6.5 thanks On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 10:24:56AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: >My bet is that it's this kernel bug: > > I don't know if you've been following, but it was recently discoverd that on > smp, if multiple processes read from /dev/urandom at the same

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-12 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > [snip] > > > Hm, it is easily reproducible on SWARM, as well as on a Octane with 2 > > > CPUs. Which probably means it is a SMP-induced race condition in fork. > > > > My bet is that it's this kernel bug: > > > > I don'

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-12 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Andrew Suffield wrote: [snip] > > Hm, it is easily reproducible on SWARM, as well as on a Octane with 2 > > CPUs. Which probably means it is a SMP-induced race condition in fork. > > My bet is that it's this kernel bug: > > I don't know if you've been following, but it was recently discoverd th

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-11 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:39:04PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal > > handlers. > > After a closer look I agree. > > > I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and > > I can't get it to

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-10 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Andrew Suffield wrote: > This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal > handlers. After a closer look I agree. > I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and > I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd). > > What do you know abo

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal handlers. I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd). What do you know about it? I need to duplicate the pesky thing somehow... -- .''`.

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-10-28 Thread Thiemo Seufer
This is probably caused by glibc's #223110. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-10-21 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Package: perl Version: 5.8.7-7 Severity: serious According to http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perl&arch=mips&ver=5.8.7-7&stamp=1129566720&file=log perl fails for the t/op/fork test on mips. I tried to reproduce it and found that the test succeeds with a probability of ~50% for a locally bu