Your message dated Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341379: fixed in gnome-apt 0.4.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2005 10:22:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 02:22:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] 
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EhP6Y-00051w-Fi
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:22:26 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 273CB7002; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:22:24 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnome-apt: please rebuild against libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.3.11
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gnome-apt
Version: 0.4.8-1
Severity: grave

Hi Filip,

Since gnome-apt has previously been binNMUed (on powerpc) using the old
binNMU version scheme, it is not possible to binNMU it under the new
versioning scheme.  Since apt has just bumped its library version to
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.11, a sourceful upload of gnome-apt is needed.
Please upload at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDjX1fKN6ufymYLloRAnD2AJ9wUoZoz2lbb3mWEyxnr8oSp0I5NgCdGDmZ
33KpTcJUOXNP7nuBo0YHbTM=
=gI+2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341379-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 07:11:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 21 23:11:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EpKSo-0004cZ-OE; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:02:10 -0800
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#341379: fixed in gnome-apt 0.4.9-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:02:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gnome-apt
Source-Version: 0.4.9-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-apt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gdeb_0.4.9-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-apt/gdeb_0.4.9-1_i386.deb
gnome-apt_0.4.9-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnome-apt/gnome-apt_0.4.9-1.dsc
gnome-apt_0.4.9-1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-apt/gnome-apt_0.4.9-1.tar.gz
gnome-apt_0.4.9-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-apt/gnome-apt_0.4.9-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnome-apt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:40:54 +0100
Source: gnome-apt
Binary: gdeb gnome-apt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gdeb       - graphical package inspection tool
 gnome-apt  - graphical package manager
Closes: 341379 343121
Changes: 
 gnome-apt (0.4.9-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Rebuild against new libapt version. (Closes: #341379)
   * Add sv translation, thanks to Daniel Nylander. (Closes: #343121)
Files: 
 8a03acd2efadb4c4c275c0bf6787913e 600 admin optional gnome-apt_0.4.9-1.dsc
 7bd228f3b80bc69acadef4dc32f2223d 580096 admin optional gnome-apt_0.4.9-1.tar.gz
 9f7087489998972dacc013ba0d455394 243554 admin optional 
gnome-apt_0.4.9-1_i386.deb
 65570f9437ed5bc85f31bcd2a6162d6f 29698 utils optional gdeb_0.4.9-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDqk36Ejn3CY6VDgARAiJ7AJ42lgfoyy+AOjJz57hrOl9wZdZNcQCgpmzQ
m5CnqLgviNc6HPgN0d3zpD8=
=k9Z5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to