Bug#344254: libfwbuilder6c2a: Fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2 [u]

2006-01-08 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse [c]
Steve, Thank you, I've been swamped with work, consulting and newly re-married life so I've not had time to get to it. Thank you for doing this. I'll just incorporate them into the new upstream release packaging before I upload it. Regards, Jeremy Steve Langasek wrote: tags 344254

Bug#344254: libfwbuilder6c2a: Fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2

2006-01-07 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 344254 patch thanks Hi Jeremy, I've prepared an NMU for this bug, which will be uploaded shortly so that we can get a non-RC-buggy (i.e., c2a instead of c2) libfwbuilder into etch. The trivial patch against -3.1 is attached. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever

Bug#344254: libfwbuilder6c2a: Fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2

2005-12-21 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
Package: libfwbuilder6c2a Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.3 Hi, The package fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2 to libfwbuilder6c2a, I think this has to do with wrong Conflicts/Replaces pair. Please add libfwbuilderc2 to Conflicts and Replaces and this problem is fixed. Regards,

Bug#344254: libfwbuilder6c2a: Fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2

2005-12-21 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
This would be because of rushed NMU that I did not do. I'll fix it when I get 2.0.10 ready for upload. Regards, Jeremy Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: Package: libfwbuilder6c2a Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.3 Hi, The package fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2 to

Bug#344254: libfwbuilder6c2a: Fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2

2005-12-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:06:03AM -0800, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: This would be because of rushed NMU that I did not do. Are you suggesting that you had this right in 2.0.9-3, and the NMUer reverted it in 2.0.9-3.1? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free

Bug#344254: libfwbuilder6c2a: Fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2

2005-12-21 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
What I'm saying, is that with the exception of the NMU done by yourself Steve there have been problems with every NMU done. As well, again with all but the exception of you, they were done with disregard to the Developer reference regarding NMUs and how they should be done. Because of

Bug#341669: Bug#344254: libfwbuilder6c2a: Fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2

2005-12-21 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 341669 patch thanks On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:51:21AM -0800, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: Are you suggesting that you had this right in 2.0.9-3, and the NMUer reverted it in 2.0.9-3.1? What I'm saying, is that with the exception of the NMU done by yourself Steve

Processed: Re: Bug#344254: libfwbuilder6c2a: Fails to upgrade from libfwbuilder6c2

2005-12-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 341669 patch Bug#341669: libfwbuilder-dev: Broken upload Tags were: fixed Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs