Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

2005-12-23 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Wouter van Heyst wrote: > I only understand the basics of heap-based overflows, I do not yet see > how to use this one. Someone explaining it would be very welcome. The two most common ways to exploit integer problems are a) Integers, which control a memory allocation: By letting this integer

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

2005-12-23 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Steve Kemp wrote: > > Please tell whether you deem those patches sufficient for a potential > > future security advisory, and if not, please provide pointers at what > > might be missing. > > It looks good to me. I can confirm the patch for CVE-2005-3302 is correct, I've sent a similar patch a

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

2005-12-23 Thread Steve Kemp
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 05:56:59PM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote: > > It looks good to me. I've built a package and if nobody has any > > objections I'll upload later today. > > No objections from me. Great I already uploaded the package ;) Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

2005-12-23 Thread Wouter van Heyst
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:55:07AM +, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:10:00AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > > > Steve, btw, any news on CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 (arbitrary code > > execution when importing a .bvh file)? Last I heard you were going to > > prepare an update un

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

2005-12-23 Thread Steve Kemp
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:10:00AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > Steve, btw, any news on CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 (arbitrary code > execution when importing a .bvh file)? Last I heard you were going to > prepare an update unless anybody had an issue with the changes made, > yet I haven't heard

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

2005-12-22 Thread Florian Ernst
# I consider upstream's fix to be sufficient, so: tags 344398 patch thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCC'd On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:30:46PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > An integer overflow in the header parser for .blend files can potentially > be exploited to execute code through a heap overflow.

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

2005-12-22 Thread Wouter van Heyst
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:30:46PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: blender > Version: 2.37a-1.1 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > An integer overflow in the header parser for .blend files can potentially > be exploited to execute code through a

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

2005-12-22 Thread Steve Kemp
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:30:46PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > An integer overflow in the header parser for .blend files can potentially > be exploited to execute code through a heap overflow. Please see > http://www.overflow.pl/adv/blenderinteger.txt for details. > > This is CVE-2005-447

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

2005-12-22 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: blender Version: 2.37a-1.1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole An integer overflow in the header parser for .blend files can potentially be exploited to execute code through a heap overflow. Please see http://www.overflow.pl/adv/blenderinteger.txt for details