Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346721: fixed in gtalk 0.99.10-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtalk
Version: 0.99.10-10
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

    [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

    [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

    [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

    [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gtalk
Source-Version: 0.99.10-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtalk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

etalk_0.99.10-11_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtalk/etalk_0.99.10-11_all.deb
gtalk_0.99.10-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtalk/gtalk_0.99.10-11.diff.gz
gtalk_0.99.10-11.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtalk/gtalk_0.99.10-11.dsc
gtalk_0.99.10-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtalk/gtalk_0.99.10-11_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gtalk package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:14:51 +0200
Source: gtalk
Binary: gtalk etalk
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.99.10-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 etalk      - talk client for the Emacs editor
 gtalk      - plug-in replacement for standard talk
Closes: 346721 390019
Changes: 
 gtalk (0.99.10-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * check for existens of update-inetd before calling it in postinst and
     postrm (closes: #390019)
   * include Build-Depends fix from NMU (closes: #346721)
Files: 
 b13a05090cd76d5ccbe5df9b81237550 962 net optional gtalk_0.99.10-11.dsc
 280faa065d11a0424e2ecf132b7ed5bd 11481 net optional gtalk_0.99.10-11.diff.gz
 85e8f81edafe0bfd7ed821cc9339c385 174440 editors optional 
etalk_0.99.10-11_all.deb
 f088fe38477b38606271f2aa43be99f4 141464 net optional gtalk_0.99.10-11_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBRRzORG4/9k35XC9tAQJL7ggAjSouTGoPwAFdvghSmIwuTbhQ6zAQn8OR
zmzyE5CfmB7IrUqyl5LGeOATYIQb5LeXN8z653wmp7MhpfGcppGXDaxFnu43oUXD
6X4vTvszf/v7ZhPMc1r9zaWYxNgsnS0G8TzoRnyl1//sZeYMVAg/yNMwkvAQ6V6v
UM3fgeydVra+xH69abNnYbrsT8YkQKgdcHBCJVMXBgf63EpVp9Qfq8uWdREnON7d
Q75kBYJvipz+tqLqgVcgJsn7ZQRWMy9xpJgW+1IPx54g9OG/HdHpjd2vhfTwmSMH
vzAZMr9hRl4poYfbdkME4LhbHdP+VLX2DbgYRUhB2kWwugJjFiqMeQ==
=50Bv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to