Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:57:20AM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: At this point, my best guess is that this may be a bug in 1.6.7 that has been fixed in 1.6.8. I believe a number of GC and syntax related bugs have been fixed since 1.6.7, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of those is the

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-23 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:57:20AM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: At this point, my best guess is that this may be a bug in 1.6.7 that has been fixed in 1.6.8. I believe a number of GC and syntax related bugs have been fixed since 1.6.7, and I wouldn't

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-20 Thread Rob Browning
At this point, my best guess is that this may be a bug in 1.6.7 that has been fixed in 1.6.8. I believe a number of GC and syntax related bugs have been fixed since 1.6.7, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of those is the culprit. Unfortunately, the only way I know of to reproduce this problem

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-20 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At this point, my best guess is that this may be a bug in 1.6.7 that has been fixed in 1.6.8. I believe a number of GC and syntax related bugs have been fixed since 1.6.7, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of those is the culprit. Unfortunately, the

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-13 Thread Rob Browning
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can you please work on #351693? Perhaps simply following the suggestion in the bug report would solve the problem; I don't know. But regardless, it's silly that such a small thing should be causing problems for three months now. At least when I

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can you please work on #351693? Perhaps simply following the suggestion in the bug report would solve the problem; I don't know. But regardless, it's silly that such a small thing should be causing

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-09 Thread Rob Browning
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=guile-1.6 The ia64 buildd admin clearly has just not processed the failing log. Ahh. This isn't (or may not be) the same problem. It's not failing in the test suite, but rather when trying to build the

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=guile-1.6 The ia64 buildd admin clearly has just not processed the failing log. Ahh. This isn't (or may not be) the same problem. It's not failing in the test

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-09 Thread Rob Browning
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't know what you're talking about. Actually, I just clicked on the wrong link. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 --

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't know what you're talking about. Actually, I just clicked on the wrong link. Oh good, it seemed like we were surely looking at different files entirely. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#351693: status of #351693?

2006-05-08 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Can you please work on #351693? Perhaps simply following the suggestion in the bug report would solve the problem; I don't know. But regardless, it's silly that such a small thing should be causing problems for three months now. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a