Hi Florent,
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, thank you very much. We now have the permission from all
copyright holders I could identify for ae. :-)
When I have some time, I'll submit an updated package to Lars with the
LPPL license applied to all files, which he can review
Hi,
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Florent,
[...]
any chance that you find time for this?
This is now done. Sorry for taking so much time, but this is one of
those boring tasks with unclear non-technical choices[1] to make, so...
[1] Who are the copyright holders for $file?
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Florent,
[...]
any chance that you find time for this?
This is now done.
Great, merci beaucoup. You've forwarded it to Lars, so that he'll do
the upload?
Sorry for taking so much time, but this is
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, merci beaucoup. You've forwarded it to Lars, so that he'll do
the upload?
Yes, it's the previous message in the bug log. But indeed, I don't
recall having seen it on -tex-maint. Maybe because it has an attachment
of approx. 230 Ko? Hmmm...
No
Hi,
Rolf Niepraschk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My account has been changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would be nice if
you can change this also in ae.sty.
This address is the one I tried previously. So, you mean we should use
the @gmx.de one instead, right?
From a pratical point of view, I think
Dear Rolf,
I'm trying to reach you again using a different address, because my
previous attempt[1] with your @ptb.de address failed.
As part of a license audit in progress for the TeX distributions teTeX
and TeX Live, we Debian[2] TeX maintainers found that a number of files
in the ae package
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looking at the ae package, it appears that you hold copyright on the
following file:
src/aelatin.mtx
Do you accept that this file be distributed under the LPPL, with the
following statement, as suggested in the latest version of the LPPL?
%
Gilbert Ritschard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is to confirm that I accept that the file
ae.sty
be distributed under the LPPL, with the following statement
% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version
Not sure if that worked (signing). Lets try again,
agreeing to the LPPL license
sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sebastian Rahtz) wrote:
% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3
% of this license or (at your option) any later version.
% The latest version of this license is in
%
Dear Sebastian,
As part of a license audit in progress for the TeX distributions teTeX
and TeX Live, we Debian[1] TeX maintainers found that a number of files
in the ae package have no license statement, which unfortunately renders
them undistributable.
We think that the most natural choice of
Dear Rolf,
As part of a license audit in progress for the TeX distributions teTeX
and TeX Live, we Debian[1] TeX maintainers found that a number of files
in the ae package have no license statement, which unfortunately renders
them undistributable.
We think that the most natural choice of
Dear Matthias,
As part of a license audit in progress for the TeX distributions teTeX
and TeX Live, we Debian[1] TeX maintainers found that a number of files
in the ae package have no license statement, which unfortunately renders
them undistributable.
We think that the most natural choice of
13 matches
Mail list logo
