Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ralf, hi Norbert,
Still no answer...
Should we just go on and let tetex-base's and tetex-extra's postinst
call
create_tetex_formats --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf
I think that would help, too, at least with jadetex and friends.
Frank Küster wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ralf, hi Norbert,
Still no answer...
Sorry, this message got pushed pack to deeply due to some email troubles
I had during the last few days. Never reboot the wrong server without
thinking :-(
Should we just go on and let
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
create_tetex_formats --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf
I think that would help, too, at least with jadetex and friends.
There's an other potential problem here. If a new tetex-base contains a
change that requires the LaTeX formats to be
Hi Ralf, hi Norbert,
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A general point: Recently I was thinking whether it would make sense to
change the behaviour of 'format providing packages' such as tetex-base
or jadetex:
4 matches
Mail list logo