Bug#390129: Rebuilding only provided formats - will that work?

2006-10-05 Thread Frank Küster
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ralf, hi Norbert, Still no answer... Should we just go on and let tetex-base's and tetex-extra's postinst call create_tetex_formats --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf I think that would help, too, at least with jadetex and friends.

Bug#390129: Rebuilding only provided formats - will that work?

2006-10-05 Thread Ralf Stubner
Frank Küster wrote: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ralf, hi Norbert, Still no answer... Sorry, this message got pushed pack to deeply due to some email troubles I had during the last few days. Never reboot the wrong server without thinking :-( Should we just go on and let

Bug#390129: Rebuilding only provided formats - will that work?

2006-10-05 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: create_tetex_formats --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf I think that would help, too, at least with jadetex and friends. There's an other potential problem here. If a new tetex-base contains a change that requires the LaTeX formats to be

Bug#390129: Rebuilding only provided formats - will that work? (was: Bug#390129: tetex-base: Does not properly call update-* scripts)

2006-10-02 Thread Frank Küster
Hi Ralf, hi Norbert, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A general point: Recently I was thinking whether it would make sense to change the behaviour of 'format providing packages' such as tetex-base or jadetex: