Op wo, 18-10-2006 te 09:07 -0700, schreef Isaac Jones: > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 06:32:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > >> John Goerzen wrote: > >> >Yes, I think Ian did the right thing, too. We don't want another > >> >release of Debian that ships with an outdated Haskell from the get-go. > >> > >> I imagine I will agree once the FTBFS mess has been dealt with. Until > >> then... > > > > That shouldn't be too bad. I seem to maintain half the stuff on that > > list, and I'm going to start fixing it in the next day or two. I'm > > willing to NMU anything else that is still broken, too. > > Can someone take a look at darcs and see if it's easy to get it > building again? I'm also tempted to package the current pre-release; > do we know if that builds w/ 6.6?
I am trying the 1.0.9rc1 but I need libghc6-html-dev to make sure it builds. I will ask Ian to upload it to haskell-experimental and try to come up with a diff.gz for 1.0.9rc1 > BTW, does anyone want to take over Hugs packaging? I took a stab at packaging the last release, but got demotivated when it contained a debian/ dir with a control file which splits hugs in a lot of different binary packages. :-) Who added the debian dir upstream anyway? I am willing to give it another shot if you don't have the time. Is it you intention to split the hugs package in a lot of different binary packages? Greetings Arjan
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
