Bug#396225: closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: Info received (Bug#396225 closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: openoffice.org 2.0.4-2 simpress crashe

2006-11-04 Thread Jarno Elonen
> Jarno: Are you *sure* this should be still kept in the archive? No. :) I just tried the latest version of Voikko and though it still didn't recognize a lot of valid words on the test texts, the ratio was now good enough to make the it actually usable. Great stuff, I'm going ahead with the rem

Bug#396225: closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: Info received (Bug#396225 closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: openoffice.org 2.0.4-2 simpress crashe

2006-11-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
reopen 396225 severity 396225 grave retitle 396225 -2 "poisoned" hosts found 396225 1.1.1-2 retitle 394862 RM: openoffice.org-soikko -- RoOOoM; unmaintained upstream, buggy, non-free, superseded by -voikko thanks Hi, Am Freitag, 3. November 2006 10:16 schrieben Sie: > ok, i'll give up on this.

Bug#396225: closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: Info received (Bug#396225 closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: openoffice.org 2.0.4-2 simpress crashe

2006-11-03 Thread Juha Heinanen
Rene Engelhard writes: > > see my earlier posting. the host didn't have soikko installed. i can > > Had it never? > > See my later comment. ok, i'll give up on this. for some reason on hosts where soikko -2 that used libstlport5.0 was installed, it happens that removing libstlport5.0 do

Bug#396225: closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: Info received (Bug#396225 closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: openoffice.org 2.0.4-2 simpress crashe

2006-11-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 11:57 schrieben Sie: > Rene Engelhard writes: > > > And I already said it works here for me, so unless you have new info > > which shows that libstlport5.0 is involved without having soikko installed > > I don't see what needs to be fixed there. > > see my earli

Bug#396225: closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: Info received (Bug#396225 closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: openoffice.org 2.0.4-2 simpress crashe

2006-11-02 Thread Juha Heinanen
Rene Engelhard writes: > And I already said it works here for me, so unless you have new info > which shows that libstlport5.0 is involved without having soikko installed > I don't see what needs to be fixed there. see my earlier posting. the host didn't have soikko installed. i can crash OO

Bug#396225: closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: Info received (Bug#396225 closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: openoffice.org 2.0.4-2 simpress crashe

2006-11-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 06:46 schrieben Sie: > as you can see, OO crashes without soikko as long as libstlport5.0 is > installed (along with libstlport4.6c2). the only way you can close the > bug without fixing it is to make OO package CONFLICT with libstlport5.0 > package so that lib

Bug#396225: closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: Info received (Bug#396225 closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: openoffice.org 2.0.4-2 simpress crashe

2006-11-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 11:12 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 06:46 schrieben Sie: > > as you can see, OO crashes without soikko as long as libstlport5.0 is > > installed (along with libstlport4.6c2). the only way you can close the > > bug without fixing

Bug#396225: closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: Info received (Bug#396225 closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#396225: openoffice.org 2.0.4-2 simpress crashe

2006-11-01 Thread Juha Heinanen
Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > It has been closed by Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. ... > Jarno Elonen wrote: > > Ok, I just uploaded a rebuild. Rene, do you want me to close > > the bug or reassign it back to OOo? > > Can be closed. (I feel free to do it) > > That's becau