Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-22 Thread Mohammed Sameer
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:57:16PM -0500, Jeff Beaird wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:29:31PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote: I don't know if it makes a difference, but I'm quite sure I didn't have this problem on another unstable machine. The machine which is having

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:29:31PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote: I don't know if it makes a difference, but I'm quite sure I didn't have this problem on another unstable machine. The machine which is having the problem was recently installed from scratch; the other machine had been

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-21 Thread Jeff Beaird
Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:29:31PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote: I don't know if it makes a difference, but I'm quite sure I didn't have this problem on another unstable machine. The machine which is having the problem was recently installed from scratch; the other

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-17 Thread Mohammed Sameer
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:08:27PM -0500, Jeff Beaird wrote: Mohammed Sameer wrote: I had a look at the source code for gnome-terminal. gnome-terminal is setting the HOME environmental variable as well as some other variables. This explains why it's working fine with -display. I'll

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-11 Thread Jeff Beaird
Mohammed Sameer wrote: I had a look at the source code for gnome-terminal. gnome-terminal is setting the HOME environmental variable as well as some other variables. This explains why it's working fine with -display. I'll work on a patch for that. Thanks, Mohammed. I don't know if it

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-08 Thread Mohammed Sameer
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:07:29AM -0500, Jeff Beaird wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: The point is that, according to the bug submitter, programs being run *under* multi-gnome-terminal don't have $DISPLAY set in their environment. It may indeed still not be an m-g-t bug, but at least it

Processed: Re: Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: owner 400923 ! Bug#400923: gdm: $DISPLAY variable not set Owner recorded as Mohammed Sameer [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-08 Thread Mohammed Sameer
owner 400923 ! thanks setting the HOME environmental variable a Oops. Meant DISPLAY -- GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group www.eglug.org Member. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-05 Thread Jeff Beaird
Steve Langasek wrote: The point is that, according to the bug submitter, programs being run *under* multi-gnome-terminal don't have $DISPLAY set in their environment. It may indeed still not be an m-g-t bug, but at least it doesn't appear to be a gdm bug. I, too, doubt that it's a

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-04 Thread Mohammed Sameer
Hi, I don't really get it. All X11 applications expect either $DISPLAY being set or -display being passed. How can gnome-terminal run when $DISPLAY is not set ? I don't think this is a multi-gnome-terminal bug. -- GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:55:11PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote: I don't really get it. All X11 applications expect either $DISPLAY being set or -display being passed. How can gnome-terminal run when $DISPLAY is not set ? I don't think this is a multi-gnome-terminal bug. The point is