On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:25:51AM -0800, J.P. Larocque wrote: > On what perhaps should be filed in a separate bug report: Why aren't > the NBD_SERVER_OPTS* lines configurable with debconf?
Debconf is not a registry. This type of thing really is advanced configuration already, and I don't think it's horribly bad if it's impossible to configure from debconf. Granted, the argument to the -l parameter might be interesting to be configurable from debconf. In any case, though, the 2.9 release (which is out upstream, but not mature enough yet for inclusion in etch---that's lenny material) will have its own configuration file format that I'll have to support, which will require rewriting the debconf configuration anyway; so I won't modify the way things work currently anymore. I'm currently working on a new Debian release of nbd, which includes your patch. Thanks! -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
