Luk writes:
...it would be better if you upload with a version between stable and
unstable.
I don't know what you mean by that.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Hasler wrote:
Luk writes:
...it would be better if you upload with a version between stable and
unstable.
I don't know what you mean by that.
Uploading the patch to proposed-updates with a version between 2.3.15 and
2.3.16, for instance 2.3.15etch1.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
In the archive stable-proposed-updates and proposed-updates are links to
etch-proposed updates. Yesterday, not having heard back from the admins, I
tried another experiment and uploaded 2.3.17 to proposed-updates. It
hasn't bounced so I apparently guessed right this time.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL
John Hasler wrote:
In the archive stable-proposed-updates and proposed-updates are links to
etch-proposed updates. Yesterday, not having heard back from the admins, I
tried another experiment and uploaded 2.3.17 to proposed-updates. It
hasn't bounced so I apparently guessed right this time.
Luk writes:
Though it might get rejected as the version is higher than the version in
testing...
I uploaded to both proposed-updates and to Unstable. If the version is a
problem the admins can push it through into Testing before installing it in
Stable.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Hasler wrote:
Luk writes:
Though it might get rejected as the version is higher than the version in
testing...
I uploaded to both proposed-updates and to Unstable. If the version is a
problem the admins can push it through into Testing before installing it in
Stable.
They won't
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 21:53:47 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
I uploaded pppconfig 2.3.17 complete with French man page and Replaces:
manpages-fr to etch-proposed-updates as instructed. Debian Installer
responded with:
Rejected: Unknown distribution `etch-proposed-updates'.
The distribution
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 21:53:47 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
I uploaded pppconfig 2.3.17 complete with French man page and Replaces:
manpages-fr to etch-proposed-updates as instructed. Debian Installer
responded with:
Rejected: Unknown distribution
I wrote:
I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr.
Thomas Huriaux writes:
See policy 7.5.1.
This looks like a last-resort measure to me. Uploading a version pppconfig
with the man page deleted makes more sense.
Because this bug is not present neither in unstable nor in testing. It
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:19:50 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
I wrote:
I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr.
Thomas Huriaux writes:
See policy 7.5.1.
This looks like a last-resort measure to me. Uploading a version pppconfig
with the man page deleted makes more sense.
No,
I uploaded pppconfig 2.3.17 complete with French man page and Replaces:
manpages-fr to etch-proposed-updates as instructed. Debian Installer
responded with:
Rejected: Unknown distribution `etch-proposed-updates'.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/05/2007):
Could you please explain why you removed the manpage instead of using a
replace field as suggested...
I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr.
See policy 7.5.1.
In any case, If a French
man page for pppconfig is in manpages-fr why
Hi,
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/05/2007):
Source: pppconfig
Source-Version: 2.3.16
pppconfig (2.3.16) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Removed French man page.
Closes: #418350: missing Replaces: manpages-fr ( 2.39.1-5)
Could you please explain why you removed the manpage
Could you please explain why you removed the manpage instead of using a
replace field as suggested...
I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr. In any case, If a French
man page for pppconfig is in manpages-fr why should I bloat pppconfig with
another?. It's bloated enough with
14 matches
Mail list logo
