Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder whether we should think of gathering information about a
potential texlive-builddep package. While there are reasons that
collection-latexbase does not contain the EC fonts, most packages that
build-depend on TeX will need them, and there
On Don, 03 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
Or `texlive'?
Depends: texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-latex-recommended,
texlive-latex-base
which is reasonable.
Yes and no. texlive is a user-oriented, what I was thinking of is
something Build-dep-oriented. It might be the same now,
On Mit, 02 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
! I can't find file `ecrm1095'.
That's an interesting one: It used only texlive-latex-base as
Build-Dep. It's already fixed by adding tl-latex-recommended, I hope it
works this time.
Should.
(Hint: This wouldn't have happened if all packages
Package: fiaif
Version: 1.21.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000 rebuild
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags 421919 builddep-tetex-ftbfs
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Relevant parts:
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def)kpathsea: Running mktextfm
ecrm1095
mktextfm: Running mf-nowin
5 matches
Mail list logo
