Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 423298 normal reassign 423298 wnpp retitle 423298 O: mercury -- A new logic/functional programming language thanks On 01/06/07 at 22:02 +1200, Roy Ward wrote: I'd like to adopt the mercury (and mercury-docs) packages, unless someone more qualified wishes to do it. Hi Roy, I've just

Processed: Re: Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 423298 normal Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' reassign 423298 wnpp Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `mercury' to `wnpp'. retitle

Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned?

2007-06-01 Thread Roy Ward
I'd like to adopt the mercury (and mercury-docs) packages, unless someone more qualified wishes to do it. I've been using Mercury on Debian (i386 and amd64) for some years now, and want this easily available to other Debian users. I am not a Mercury developer, but the feedback I've had from

Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-11 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: mercury Version: 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Several Release