Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1

2007-07-10 Thread martin f krafft
Package: libc6 Version: 2.6-1 Severity: serious dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package lib32z1 -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1

2007-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 432491 lib32z Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1 Warning: Unknown package 'lib32z' Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `lib32z'. forcemerge 432491 432330 Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1 Bug#432330: libc6-i386: trying

Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1

2007-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Let's try again reassign 432491 lib32z1 Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1 Warning: Unknown package 'lib32z' Bug reassigned from package `lib32z' to `lib32z1'. forcemerge 432491 432330 Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1 Bug#432330

Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1

2007-07-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.10.1043 +0200]: not a libc problem. Well, my bad for not checking lib32z1, but the important point is that I dist-upgraded within sid and libc6 failed to install, not lib32z1. Thus, since lib32z1 was first, it's libc6's job to work around it

Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1

2007-07-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
reassign 432491 lib32z forcemerge 432491 432330 thanks On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:22:11AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.6-1 Severity: serious dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite

Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1

2007-07-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:02:38AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: updated. The bad version still lives in lenny though, so I wonder what will happen if libc6 migrates to lenny before lib32z1. Also, on That at least is unlikely - the only thing holding zlib out of testing is glibc and manual