Package: libc6
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package lib32z1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 432491 lib32z
Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1
Warning: Unknown package 'lib32z'
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `lib32z'.
forcemerge 432491 432330
Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1
Bug#432330: libc6-i386: trying
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Let's try again
reassign 432491 lib32z1
Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1
Warning: Unknown package 'lib32z'
Bug reassigned from package `lib32z' to `lib32z1'.
forcemerge 432491 432330
Bug#432491: missing conflict with lib32z1
Bug#432330
also sprach Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.10.1043 +0200]:
not a libc problem.
Well, my bad for not checking lib32z1, but the important point is
that I dist-upgraded within sid and libc6 failed to install, not
lib32z1. Thus, since lib32z1 was first, it's libc6's job to work
around it
reassign 432491 lib32z
forcemerge 432491 432330
thanks
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:22:11AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:02:38AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
updated. The bad version still lives in lenny though, so I wonder
what will happen if libc6 migrates to lenny before lib32z1. Also, on
That at least is unlikely - the only thing holding zlib out of testing
is glibc and manual
6 matches
Mail list logo