Bug#441763: [Pkg-db-devel] Bug#441763: actually, no.

2007-09-14 Thread Florian Weimer
* Zack Weinberg: That being so, clearly libdb4.2 needs to get relinked against libpthread for the moment. I would have preferred to fix this only in libc6 because that kind of for-the-moment change tends to get left long after it is unnecessary again, and libdb gets used all over the place,

Bug#441763: actually, no.

2007-09-13 Thread Zack Weinberg
reassign 441763 libc6 retitle 441763 /lib/libc.so.6 is missing several stub pthread interfaces thanks Brian Carlson is seriously mistaken in all of his statements about this bug. It is possible to write correct C++ code that does not need any of the libraries that g++ adds to the link, and in

Bug#441763: actually, no.

2007-09-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
reassign 441763 libdb4.2 thanks On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 04:47:01PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: reassign 441763 libc6 retitle 441763 /lib/libc.so.6 is missing several stub pthread interfaces thanks Brian Carlson is seriously mistaken in all of his statements about this bug. It is possible

Processed: Re: Bug#441763: actually, no.

2007-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 441763 libdb4.2 Bug#441763: /lib/libc.so.6 is missing several stub pthread interfaces Bug#441870: /lib/libc.so.6 is missing several stub pthread interfaces Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `libdb4.2'. thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#441763: actually, no.

2007-09-13 Thread Zack Weinberg
clone 441763 -1 severity -1 wishlist reassign -1 libc6 thanks What the fuck? Do you have in mind that you rely on a feature that does not exists, and you are shouting because it does not exists? I was not shouting, and even if I were, this level of abuse is inappropriate. libc.so.6's has