On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of
Lucas Nussbaum told:
> On 23/01/08 at 20:35 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of
> > Lucas Nussbaum told:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see
> > > http://buildd.de
On 23/01/08 at 20:35 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of
> Lucas Nussbaum told:
>
> [...]
> > Hi,
> >
> > coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579
> > And I
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of
Lucas Nussbaum told:
[...]
> Hi,
>
> coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579
> And I couldn't reproduce the problem by building it manually on
> bruckner.d.o
On 15/09/07 at 22:58 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 the mental interface of
> Michael Stone told:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >> Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on
> >> a PowerBook5,6.
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:20:25PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some
kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha
amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some
> kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha
> amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel sparc, and seq just doesn't do anything
> particularly c
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 the mental interface of
Michael Stone told:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on
>> a PowerBook5,6.
>
> Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some k
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on
a PowerBook5,6.
Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some
kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 the mental interface of
Bram Senders told:
> Package: coreutils
> Version: 6.10~20070907
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> Hi there,
>
> I cannot build the current coreutils from experimental from source on
> PowerPC, because of a failure i
Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Thanks for the report.
>> However, I've just built from the very latest upstream sources
>> (but probably no change to seq since the 20070907 snapshot)
>> on bruckner, with "CFLAGS=-g ./confi
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thanks for the report.
> However, I've just built from the very latest upstream sources
> (but probably no change to seq since the 20070907 snapshot)
> on bruckner, with "CFLAGS=-g ./configure && make", and it passes
> that same test:
Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: coreutils
> Version: 6.10~20070907
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> Hi there,
>
> I cannot build the current coreutils from experimental from source on
> PowerPC, because of a failure in the seq test suite:
...
Package: coreutils
Version: 6.10~20070907
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi there,
I cannot build the current coreutils from experimental from source on
PowerPC, because of a failure in the seq test suite:
=== 8< ===
Making check in seq
make[3]: Entering directory
13 matches
Mail list logo