Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2008-01-23 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of Lucas Nussbaum told: > On 23/01/08 at 20:35 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of > > Lucas Nussbaum told: > > > > [...] > > > Hi, > > > > > > coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see > > > http://buildd.de

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2008-01-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/01/08 at 20:35 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of > Lucas Nussbaum told: > > [...] > > Hi, > > > > coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579 > > And I

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2008-01-23 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of Lucas Nussbaum told: [...] > Hi, > > coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579 > And I couldn't reproduce the problem by building it manually on > bruckner.d.o

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2008-01-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/09/07 at 22:58 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 the mental interface of > Michael Stone told: > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > >> Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on > >> a PowerBook5,6. > > > >

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2007-09-18 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:20:25PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2007-09-17 Thread Tony Breeds
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some > kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha > amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel sparc, and seq just doesn't do anything > particularly c

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2007-09-15 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 the mental interface of Michael Stone told: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: >> Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on >> a PowerBook5,6. > > Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some k

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2007-09-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on a PowerBook5,6. Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2007-09-15 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 the mental interface of Bram Senders told: > Package: coreutils > Version: 6.10~20070907 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > Hi there, > > I cannot build the current coreutils from experimental from source on > PowerPC, because of a failure i

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2007-09-13 Thread Jim Meyering
Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Thanks for the report. >> However, I've just built from the very latest upstream sources >> (but probably no change to seq since the 20070907 snapshot) >> on bruckner, with "CFLAGS=-g ./confi

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2007-09-13 Thread Bram Senders
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Thanks for the report. > However, I've just built from the very latest upstream sources > (but probably no change to seq since the 20070907 snapshot) > on bruckner, with "CFLAGS=-g ./configure && make", and it passes > that same test:

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2007-09-12 Thread Jim Meyering
Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: coreutils > Version: 6.10~20070907 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > Hi there, > > I cannot build the current coreutils from experimental from source on > PowerPC, because of a failure in the seq test suite: ...

Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite

2007-09-12 Thread Bram Senders
Package: coreutils Version: 6.10~20070907 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi there, I cannot build the current coreutils from experimental from source on PowerPC, because of a failure in the seq test suite: === 8< === Making check in seq make[3]: Entering directory