On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 12:58:12AM +1000, skaller wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 14:26 +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > > > In particular I could do it if INR
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 14:26 +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > > In particular I could do it if INRIA said that they would support the
> > > change in some future re
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > In particular I could do it if INRIA said that they would support the
> > change in some future release (see the exception "Patches Heading
> > Upstream"). But o
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> In particular I could do it if INRIA said that they would support the
> change in some future release (see the exception "Patches Heading
> Upstream"). But otherwise this is quite a large ABI change -- if
> Fedora users started to bu
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:32:16PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:17:00PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > No I don't actually. It's strange because I didn't hit this bug at
> > all when compiling ocamlnet for Fedora.
>
> Are you building the Apache connector? The bu
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:17:00PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> No I don't actually. It's strange because I didn't hit this bug at
> all when compiling ocamlnet for Fedora.
Are you building the Apache connector? The bug manifests itself only if
you're building that, and only on architecture in w
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:59:20PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:59:45AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Aaaarggh, right! IIRC that's an upstream issue for which exists a patch
> > (by Richard Jones maybe ...), isn't it? What about applying it in the
> > OCaml D
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:59:45AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Aaaarggh, right! IIRC that's an upstream issue for which exists a patch
> (by Richard Jones maybe ...), isn't it? What about applying it in the
> OCaml Debian package?
Yep, that was the case, here is a link to the corresponding
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:48:50AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> The problem seems to be that you're trying to build the
> mod_netcgi_apache.so shared object while linking with -lcamlrun, but
> libcamlrun only exists as a static (non-PIC) library.
Aaaarggh, right! IIRC that's an upstream issue fo
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:12:35 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:06AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > your package failed to build from source.
>
> Yep, thanks, was already reported.
>
> I'll look into this but I would appreciate help from some of the Apache
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 444360 443150
Bug#443150: ocamlnet/2.2.8.1-3 (alpha) FTBFS, Re: Log for failed build of
ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3 (dist=experimental)
Bug#444360: ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to link non-PIC
static object into shared obj
merge 444360 443150
tags 444360 + help
tags 443150 + help
thanks
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:06AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> your package failed to build from source.
Yep, thanks, was already reported.
I'll look into this but I would appreciate help from some of the Apache
guys, since a
Package: ocamlnet
Version: 2.2.8.1-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20070927-2256
| **
| Check
13 matches
Mail list logo
