Processed: Re: Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2008-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 444715 ftp.debian.org Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `skippy' to `ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 444715 RM: skippy -- RoQA ; obsolete, RC buggy Bug#444715: skippy: should this pa

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2008-01-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
reassign 444715 ftp.debian.org retitle 444715 RM: skippy -- RoQA ; obsolete, RC buggy severity 444715 normal thanks On 19/12/07 at 08:37 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 19/12/07 at 13:59 +1100, Niv Sardi wrote: > > At 01:46 on Dec 19 2007, Lucas Nussbaum said : > > > > > clone 444715 -1 > > > r

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2007-12-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 19/12/07 at 13:59 +1100, Niv Sardi wrote: > At 01:46 on Dec 19 2007, Lucas Nussbaum said : > > > clone 444715 -1 > > reassign -1 wnpp > > severity -1 normal > > retitle -1 O: skippy -- full-screen X11 task/window switcher, similar to OSX > > Expose > > thanks > > > > Hi, > > > > Since the

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2007-12-18 Thread Niv Sardi
At 01:46 on Dec 19 2007, Lucas Nussbaum said : > clone 444715 -1 > reassign -1 wnpp > severity -1 normal > retitle -1 O: skippy -- full-screen X11 task/window switcher, similar to OSX > Expose > thanks > > Hi, > > Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package. > I sti

Processed: Re: Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2007-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 444715 -1 Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed? Bug 444715 cloned as bug 456926. > reassign -1 wnpp Bug#456926: skippy: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `skippy' to `wnpp'. > sev

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2007-12-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
clone 444715 -1 reassign -1 wnpp severity -1 normal retitle -1 O: skippy -- full-screen X11 task/window switcher, similar to OSX Expose thanks Hi, Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package. I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning could

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2007-11-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/10/07 at 08:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 15/10/07 at 11:47 +1000, Niv Sardi wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > > > came up as a possible candidate for r

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2007-10-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/10/07 at 11:47 +1000, Niv Sardi wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > > came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: > > > > * 1 RC bug opened for a l

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2007-10-14 Thread Niv Sardi
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: > > * 1 RC bug opened for a long time. This bug is tagged help for a while and nobody has

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

2007-09-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: skippy Version: 0.5.1rc1-6 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * 1 RC bug opened for a long time. * useless with