Processed: Re: Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?

2008-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 444724 normal Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 444724 ftp.debian.org Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `tmda

Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?

2008-01-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 444724 normal reassign 444724 ftp.debian.org retitle 444724 RM: tmda -- RoQA; unmaintained, useless thanks On 30/09/07 at 16:36 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: tmda > Version: 1.0.3-1.1 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: proposed-removal > > Hi, > > While

Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?

2007-11-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
close 444724 -1 reassign -1 wnpp severity -1 normal retitle -1 O: tmda -- Tagged Message Delivery Agent thanks On 30/09/07 at 16:36 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: tmda > Version: 1.0.3-1.1 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: proposed-removal > > Hi, > > While revie

Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?

2007-09-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: tmda Version: 1.0.3-1.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Upstream doesn't want TMDA to be included in a stab