Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

2007-12-18 Thread Hubert Chathi
severity 453242 important thanks While this bug is rather severe, it evidently hasn't caused problems so far (I guess not many people have been running GNUstep on Opeterons, since nobody's reported a bug yet). The proper fix (for now, until ffcall gets fixed) seems to be to use libffi instead of

Processed: Re: Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

2007-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 453242 important Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no Severity set to `important' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

2007-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 11/12/07 at 21:10 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote: Hi Lucas, On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

2007-12-12 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:11:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On 11/12/07 at 21:10 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote: Do you have any security-related features enabled? PaX, grsecurity, SELinux, etc.? It could be related to GNUstep bug #18968.

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

2007-12-11 Thread Hubert Chathi
Hi Lucas, On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the problem. Relevant part: checking if ffcall trampolines

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

2007-11-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 28/11/07 at 23:51 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote: Hi Lucas, On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

2007-11-29 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:50:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 28/11/07 at 23:51 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote: However, the test probably tries to *run* the code, not just compile it. That's right, it is run via the AC_RUN_IFELSE macro, where the condition for cross-compiling is set to

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

2007-11-28 Thread Hubert Chathi
Hi Lucas, On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the problem. It compiles fine on my machine, which is a normal

Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no

2007-11-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: gnustep-base version: 1.14.1-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of