On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 07:34:12AM +, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 08:39:03AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > Dear security team, you broke lighttpd badly with your last upload,
> > > because you use a broken patch to fix the last CVE on it. Plea
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 08:39:03AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Dear security team, you broke lighttpd badly with your last upload,
> > because you use a broken patch to fix the last CVE on it. Please update
> > the patch, using e.g. the one in the unstable version inst
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 08:39:03AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Dear security team, you broke lighttpd badly with your last upload,
> because you use a broken patch to fix the last CVE on it. Please update
> the patch, using e.g. the one in the unstable version instead. You've
> broken lightt
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:40:07AM +, Shane McChesney wrote:
> Glad I found this thread, it explains the 239GB error log I just blew
> away and the new one growing on the server now.
>
> On 1.4.13-4etch7, running:
>
> apt-get update
> apt-get install lighttpd
>
> says "lighttpd is alread
4 matches
Mail list logo
