* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-28 08:54]:
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-27 07:45]:
If lenny's freeze keeps apex from moving on: Will we need to ask the
release manager?
Yes, in theory we would; but it seems this package isn't frozen yet.
... okay, the new APEX
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-27 07:45]:
If lenny's freeze keeps apex from moving on: Will we need to ask the
release manager?
Yes, in theory we would; but it seems this package isn't frozen yet.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
This has been fixed in version 2.6.25-3 of linux-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx
which is now in unstable. Would be great if you (Paul, Kevin) could
confirm it works.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
This has been fixed in version 2.6.25-3 of linux-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx
which is now in unstable. Would be great if you (Paul, Kevin) could
confirm it works.
Yes, confirmed. It works nicely for me. I re-flashed the old apex from
debian, and set modules=most in
Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
This has been fixed in version 2.6.25-3 of linux-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx
which is now in unstable. Would be great if you (Paul, Kevin) could
confirm it works.
Yes, confirmed. It works nicely for me.
Works great here too.
Kevin Price schrieb:
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
The 2.6.26-rc2 test image is available from
http://people.debian.org/~tbm/armel/kernel/r11383/
The fixed 2.6.25 package will be uploaded in the near future.
At least the 2.6.26-rc2 makes my slug unbootable. Again, I need some
time to hook the
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
The 2.6.26-rc2 test image is available from
http://people.debian.org/~tbm/armel/kernel/r11383/
The fixed 2.6.25 package will be uploaded in the near future.
At least the 2.6.26-rc2 makes my slug unbootable. Again, I need some
time to hook the serial console up to
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 19:13]:
But never mind, I actually started a build of 2.6.26-rc1 on a
.debian.org armel box already.
Okay, I have something now that works:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3885442 May 13 22:13 initrd.img-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3386511 May
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 480310 [ixp4xx] armel NSLU2 ramdisk too large
Bug#480310: [ixp4xx] armel NSLU2 fails to boot with 2.6.25
Changed Bug title to `[ixp4xx] armel NSLU2 ramdisk too large' from `[ixp4xx]
armel NSLU2 fails to boot with 2.6.25'.
severity 480310
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 16:33]:
ii flash-kernel 1.7utility to write kernel and initramfs
I suggest moving this bug to package flash-kernel. Any objections?
flash-kernel does the right thing, apex-nslu2 doesn't.
Anyway, let's leave this bug open on the
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
Kevin, since you have a serial console, are you interested in testing
the patches in #451882 and #421359?
Yes. My slug is now compiling apex-1.4.15 with the patch from #451882
(CONFIG_RAMDISK_SIZE=0x0050) I am curious if this solves this bug
and I will let you
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 17:43]:
Kevin, since you have a serial console, are you interested in testing
the patches in #451882 and #421359?
Yes. My slug is now compiling apex-1.4.15 with the patch from #451882
(CONFIG_RAMDISK_SIZE=0x0050) I am curious if this solves
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
You'll also need the patch from #421359, otherwise the new APEX is not
written to flash.
Yeah. I was thinking from a more low-level point of view and flashed the
apex binary myself with the script. The result is good: The large initrd
(modules=all) boots fine with
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 18:36]:
That was because I dislike the idea about the imaginary version
1.5.14. Is it more appropriate to name it something like 1.5.13+gf1
? I'll give it a try.
I suggest you use 1.5.14~test1; the ~ means that 1.5.14~xxx is smaller
than 1.5.14, so
14 matches
Mail list logo
