Better... how?
There're ways, but that doesn't matter. You may deal with this bug like
#441339 (wontfix and lower severity).
It looks like the submitter doesn't need ia32 software however. In that
case, it'd be nice to split the package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:23:28AM +0200, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
There're ways, but that doesn't matter. You may deal with this bug like
#441339 (wontfix and lower severity).
By shipping an alternate dynamic linker and diverting files in
libc6-i386? What are these ways?
It looks like the
El dv 01 de 08 de 2008 a les 10:13 +, en/na Clint Adams va escriure:
What are these ways?
/usr/lib32 is a compliant location. The multiarch directory too but,
while it does work, it isn't the current direction. You should ask the
ia32 libs maintainers for further advice.
In that case,
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:23:42PM +0200, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
/usr/lib32 is a compliant location. The multiarch directory too but,
/usr/lib32 is a symlink to /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib. There are at least
two reasons why this means I can't ship files there. Furthermore, I
don't believe
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:50:08PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
This does not affect the usability of the package, but it is annoying to
have these files under /emul. Probably these are used for building i386
packages, but a better location should be selected.
Better... how?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: fakeroot
Version: 1.9.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1
FHS-compliance is required by Debian Policy, section 9.1. The package
includes these files:
piti:~# ls -la /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libfakeroot/
total 60
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 128 2008-05-08 10:19 .
drwxr-xr-x 3
6 matches
Mail list logo
