Bug#493162: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#493162: libxslt1.1: buffer overflow [CVE-2008-2935]

2008-08-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:19:32AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 1 August 2008 10:09, you wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:11:05AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > tags 493162 patch > > > thanks > > > > Wouldn't a lot of the strin

Bug#493162: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#493162: libxslt1.1: buffer overflow [CVE-2008-2935]

2008-08-01 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Friday 1 August 2008 10:09, you wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:11:05AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tags 493162 patch > > thanks > > Wouldn't a lot of the strings in this patch be better off allocated > on the stack? Sorry, I should have made it clearer that I was

Bug#493162: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#493162: libxslt1.1: buffer overflow [CVE-2008-2935]

2008-08-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:11:05AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tags 493162 patch > thanks Wouldn't a lot of the strings in this patch be better off allocated on the stack? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co