Bug#495663: on removing roxen4

2008-09-02 Thread Luk Claes
Thomas Viehmann wrote: Hi, according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other not built from source). Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4 would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils) have been in the last

Bug#495663: on removing roxen4

2008-08-28 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other not built from source). Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4 would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils) have been in the last stable release or are terribly

Bug#495663: on removing roxen4

2008-08-28 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other not built from source). Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4 would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils) have been in the last stable release or are

Bug#495663: on removing roxen4

2008-08-28 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other not built from source). Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4 would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils) have been in the last