On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Brian May
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steffen Möller wrote:
Teodor happened to have nicely explained my objections to rename plink.
Except what he said is wrong, puttygen hasn't been renamed.
Yes, puttygen hasn't been renamed. It was a wrong assumption from me ..
Hello,
plink has just made it to the archive.
Teodor happened to have nicely explained my objections to rename plink.
Dear Colin, if you don't mind too much, or if you could be bribed with a
few beers, please be so kind to rename the plink binary package.
Many thanks and best regards,
Steffen
Steffen Möller wrote:
Teodor happened to have nicely explained my objections to rename plink.
Except what he said is wrong, puttygen hasn't been renamed.
Dear Colin, if you don't mind too much, or if you could be bribed with a
few beers, please be so kind to rename the plink binary
Le Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Sven Joachim a écrit :
Package: plink
Version: 1.03p1-1
Severity: serious
The /usr/bin/plink name is already taken:
,
| # aptitude install plink
| [...]
| Selecting previously deselected package plink.
| (Reading database ... 134796 files
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Plink is younger than Putty, I think that the burden of the
renaming is for us (the Debian Med packaging team). I plan to rename
/usr/bin/plink to /usr/bin/Plink, that would be a symbolic link to
Le Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 06:07:11PM +0300, Teodor a écrit :
IMO a simple Conflicts: putty-tools is enough. If they provide the
same functionality than an alternative is better than conflicting
with each other.
Hello Tedor,
thanks for the feedback, but this would be against our Policy, because
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 06:07:11PM +0300, Teodor a écrit :
IMO a simple Conflicts: putty-tools is enough. If they provide the
same functionality than an alternative is better than conflicting
with each other.
Hello
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both programs are intended for command line, and could be used in
scripts. We may even find users who want to install both at the same
time. Very annoying…
Since Plink is younger than Putty, I think that the burden of
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 20:18 +0300, Teodor wrote:
Since renaming seems to be the only solution, than IMO it is more
appropriate to rename 'plink' in putty-tools than in the plink
packages since this is exactly the source/binary package name.
[...]
This has been done already in putty-tools for
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:18:23PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both programs are intended for command line, and could be used in
scripts. We may even find users who want to install both at the same
time. Very annoying…
10 matches
Mail list logo
