Dear All,
As the afio upstream maintainer I am currently working off-list with some
people to clarify the background the afio license text, how and when it got
updated and interpreted, and what were the historical intentions of the authors
involved. We are making some progress.
I expect that
Hi all,
Few comments below...
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:00:16 +0100 Erik Schanze wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I got a Bug against package "afio" because of licence problems.
> > Please see http://bugs.debian.org/509287.
> >
> > There was already a similar Bug
Erik Schanze wrote:
> What should I do?
> Have I move afio to non-free?
Thank you for bringing this question to the list - I was going to do
so, but had not found time yet.
More seriously, the Lachman Associates licence doesn't give any
permission to modify the software, does it?
So, I feel we
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:00:16 +0100 Erik Schanze wrote:
[...]
> I got a Bug against package "afio" because of licence problems.
> Please see http://bugs.debian.org/509287.
>
> There was already a similar Bug 9 years ago that was closed, after one
> person from this list gave his OK.
> (http://lis
* Erik Schanze:
> There is an ongoing discussion on a Redhat list
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 and they excluded
> the package already. There is an other blog on
> http://www.kernelplanet.org/fedora/ that gave a summary of the current
> situation.
I think the analysis
Dear debian-legal folks,
I got a Bug against package "afio" because of licence problems.
Please see http://bugs.debian.org/509287.
There was already a similar Bug 9 years ago that was closed, after one
person from this list gave his OK.
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/05/msg00162.html
6 matches
Mail list logo
