LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:05:06PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:42:11PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > > That should be fine, thanks!
> > What's the status?
>
> fix-c
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:05:06PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:42:11PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > That should be fine, thanks!
> What's the status?
fix-committed, one more bug to decide ho
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:42:11PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:38:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Lamont, are you fine with an NMU?
> > > This bug has been open for a long time and needs
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:42:11PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:38:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Lamont, are you fine with an NMU?
> > This bug has been open for a long time and needs to be fixed for Squeeze
> > soon.
>
> I have another upload for util-linux
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:38:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Lamont, are you fine with an NMU?
> This bug has been open for a long time and needs to be fixed for Squeeze
> soon.
I have another upload for util-linux that I'm planning doing late this week
or monday. (566072)
Is that soon
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:16:09PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:58:37PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > --- util-linux-2.13.1.1.orig/fdisk/fdisksgilabel.c
> > > +++ util-linux-2.13.1.1/fdisk/fdisksgilabel.c
> > > @@ -501,6 +501,9 @@
> > > }
> > > s
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:58:37PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > --- util-linux-2.13.1.1.orig/fdisk/fdisksgilabel.c
> > +++ util-linux-2.13.1.1/fdisk/fdisksgilabel.c
> > @@ -501,6 +501,9 @@
> > }
> > start = sgi_get_start_sector(Index[i])
> > + sgi
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 04:46:23AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:44:06PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> > Package: util-linux
> > Version: 2.13.1.1-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Yesterday I tried the d-i rc1 for lenny on a silicon graphics O2 (a
> > comp
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:44:06PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Package: util-linux
> Version: 2.13.1.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
>
> Yesterday I tried the d-i rc1 for lenny on a silicon graphics O2 (a
> complete report is available as Debian bug #510060).
>
> The problem I found agains
Aurelien, Ralf and Thomas:
Can you comment about the bug report (and patch) below about fdisk
with DVH labels and large disks?
* Giuseppe Sacco [2008-12-29 16:44]:
> Package: util-linux
> Version: 2.13.1.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
>
> Yesterday I tried the d-i rc1 for lenny on a silico
Ralf & Andrew,
Can you comment about the bug report (and patch) below about fdisk
with DVH labels and large disks?
* Giuseppe Sacco [2008-12-29 16:44]:
> Package: util-linux
> Version: 2.13.1.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
>
> Yesterday I tried the d-i rc1 for lenny on a silicon graphics O
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.13.1.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Yesterday I tried the d-i rc1 for lenny on a silicon graphics O2 (a
complete report is available as Debian bug #510060).
The problem I found against fdisk is that when using large disks (i.e.,
disks with more than 4096 sectors pe
12 matches
Mail list logo
