* Manuel Prinz [Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:06:24 +0100]:
> Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 18:32 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> > Okay; I think it’s reasonable to wait, as long as we make sure it gets
> > addressed at some point. Maybe we should open a separate bug report for
> > it?
> Feel free to do so i
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 18:32 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> > 3.) Patch and build all dependant software.
> > 4.) File bugs for all packages, including patches.
> > 5.) NMU if no response in a reasonable time frame.
>
> Uhm, what kind of patches are needed? Has the API changed as well
> betw
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 18:32 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> Okay; I think it’s reasonable to wait, as long as we make sure it gets
> addressed at some point. Maybe we should open a separate bug report for
> it?
Feel free to do so if you like; usually, they're very responsive and I
expect an
* Manuel Prinz [Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:49:23 +0100]:
> Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 16:14 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> > Indeed, bumping the SONAME in 1.3.1 would be great if indeed ABI
> > compatibility has been broken. Thanks for pursuing this.
> Upstream discusses the plans for future releases a
Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 16:14 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> Indeed, bumping the SONAME in 1.3.1 would be great if indeed ABI
> compatibility has been broken. Thanks for pursuing this.
Upstream discusses the plans for future releases and dealing with
SONAMEs on their development list. We'll se
Manuel Prinz wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
>> Finally, what’s this business about maintainers not being happy about
>> Bin-NMUs of their packages?
>
> Not sure if this was rethorical question or if you'd like to have more
> information on that.
Certainly
* Manuel Prinz [Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:47:26 +0100]:
> Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> > There is an unfortunate problem with it, though: you can’t use an
> > architecture restriction like [arch1 !arch2] in Build-Depends. That
> > is, you can’t mix ! and non-!; if you
Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2009, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> There is an unfortunate problem with it, though: you can’t use an
> architecture restriction like [arch1 !arch2] in Build-Depends. That
> is, you can’t mix ! and non-!; if you stop to think about it, it
> doesn’t make sense.
>
> Just
* Manuel Prinz [Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:31:45 +0100]:
> Hi Adeodato!
Hello!
> Am Freitag, den 13.03.2009, 21:41 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> > > Open MPI used to build fine on alpha, so this is probably a problem with
> > > the new upstream release. Reassigning to Open MPI maintainers.
> > It’s b
Hi Adeodato!
Am Freitag, den 13.03.2009, 21:41 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> > Open MPI used to build fine on alpha, so this is probably a problem with
> > the new upstream release. Reassigning to Open MPI maintainers.
>
> It’s been 2 months, and this issue has not been addressed. In the
> meant
* Manuel Prinz [Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:48:10 +0100]:
> reassign 510845 openmpi 1.2.8-3
> thanks
Hello, Manuel.
> Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 12:05 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> > Package: mpi-defaults
> > Version: 0.2
> > Severity: serious
> > The latest version of openmpi failed to build from sou
reassign 510845 openmpi 1.2.8-3
thanks
Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 12:05 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> Package: mpi-defaults
> Version: 0.2
> Severity: serious
>
> The latest version of openmpi failed to build from source on alpha,
> hence mpi-defaults can't be built there, because libopenmpi-dev
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 510845 openmpi 1.2.8-3
Bug#510845: mpi-defaults: FTBFS/not available on alpha
Bug reassigned from package `mpi-defaults' to `openmpi'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Package: mpi-defaults
Version: 0.2
Severity: serious
The latest version of openmpi failed to build from source on alpha,
hence mpi-defaults can't be built there, because libopenmpi-dev is not
installabe.
If mpi-defaults intends to provide packages for other packages to
build-depend on, it should
14 matches
Mail list logo